Come, Let's Sit
Mount Analogue
by René Daumal
Week 2 Art History
The Western Canons of Art History and Classicism
The Roman Apollo Belvedere copy discovered in 1489 (originally created by Leochares in 320BC). It has since been idolized and deemed as the model for most, if not all, artworks designated to portray masculinity. Apollo’s immaculate physical build was believed to portray God-like perfection amongst the respected artistic circles in the olden days. With Johann Joachim Winckelmann’s support, stating that greatness can only come from imitation of the ancients.
And hence, established a set of rules to making a canon. Not even sure canons can be made by following said paradigms… Nonetheless, masterpieces have been derived/inspired by Apollo Belvedere.
- Top: Roman Apollo Belvedere copy
- Bottom Left: David by Michelangelo, 1501-1504
- Bottom Right: Perseus with the Head of Medusa by Antionio Canova, 1800
Week 1 Art History
Genius vs Madness
Does madness necessarily lead to greatness? Why are most remarkable canons deemed as mad? Van Gogh, for example, was only diagnosed with a type of epilepsy. Is that madness? Maybe us, as the untalented audience, are intrigued by the story behind such greatness. Even if it’s not true.
Help me out here, what do you think?
[Top: Starry Night
Bottom: Wheatfield with Crows
both by Vincent Van Gogh]
Week 1 Art History
On Genius, Madness and Great Artists.
Started on Vasari’s strong belief in individuality, conformity, unity. The importance of male hegemony. Being a fan of Leonardo Da Vinci, Giotto di Bordone etc.
[On top, is the original the famous Mona Lisa by LDV
Bottom left, Duchamp’s appropriation
Bottom right, Dali’s appropriation]
